Let's say you start at q0 and get this input You can see this by the symbols above the input/output arrows. However, if you input a 1 you will go to state q2. Now, if you input a 0 you will go to state q1. There are certain output strings that are NOT possible certain finite state machines this would allow you to "match" expressions. Another way to think of an finite state machine is in terms of "valid" or "acceptable" input. Each arrow represents an input or output (depending on how you look at it). For example:Īll this is saying is that if you begin in some state q0 (the one with the Start symbol next to it) you can go to other states. A "state" is essentially just describing a set of input and outputs that have occurred and can occur from a certain point.įinite state machines are easiest to understand via diagrams. The easiest way to understand an FSM is through input and output (actually, this comprises most of the formal definition, that I won't describe here). There are some interesting mathematics but to idea is actually very trivial to understand.
EXPRESSING QUERIES AS FINITE STATE AUTOMATA HOW TO
I don't know what academic papers you've already read but it really isn't that difficult to understand how to implement a finite state machine. Which is pretty messy, so I usually rip the state cases out to separate functions. Written all in one place in c the example I linked would look something like this: token_t token Without switch-like structures, or if they are deficient in some way, you if style branching. If your implementation language supports a structure like c's switch statement, then you switch on the current state and process the input to see which action and/or transition too perform next. How do I implement my abstract state machine in Foo? In my answer to another question about regular expressions, I just looked at the parsing problem as one of being either Inside or outside a tag pair, and wrote out the transitions from there (with a beginning and ending state to keep the implementation clean). I usually use FSMs for fairly simple problems and choose them intuitively. Is the question "How do I choose the states and the transition conditions?", or "How do I implement my abstract state machine in Foo?" How do I choose the states and the transition conditions? It's not pretty (it doesn't have to be since it's not supposed to be read by humans, they're supposed to be looking at the lex/yacc code) but it may give you a better idea as to how they work.
EXPRESSING QUERIES AS FINITE STATE AUTOMATA CODE
The best thing you could do is grab a copy of some lex/yacc (or equivalent) code for a specific simple language and see the code it generates. The actual finite state machine code required to do what a one-liner RE can do is usually very long and complex. It doesn't show how to do greedy/nongreedy matches, backtracking, matching within a line (instead of the whole line) and other more esoteric features of state machines that are easily handled by the RE syntax. Now, as I said, this is a very simple example. If char is not in the set "A-Z" or "a-z" or "0-9" or "_": If char is not in the set "A-Z" or "a-z": The following pseudo-code shows how this can be done with a finite state machine: state = FIRSTCHAR Which is a typical identifier (must start with alpha and can have any number of alphanumeric and undescore characters following, including none). There are extensions to create nondeterministic Mealy machines, but nondeterminism for transducers is not really exploited, it would generate the family of outputs when one is really needed, unless it was the goal then NFST wins here.įrom physical point of view it makes difference, Mealy equivalent machines are shifted in time, but considering only the result it does not matter.Sure, although you'll need more complicated examples to truly understand how REs work. In special transduction hierarchy FST is higher than Mealy. The computational power of both is equal in the Chomsky hierarchy, but there exist machines that cannot be expressed by other type. The output is associated with states, not all combinations of states and input must be present. Scott) which can be both deterministic and non-deterministic. According to definition it must be defined for all possible combinations of states and inputs.įinite State Transducer is a generalization of Finite State Machine ( M. It could handle multiple inputs and multiple outputs but by definition cannot be non-deterministic.
Mealy) is a deterministic finite state transducer with output associated with transition (edge) instead of state.
0 kommentar(er)
